The article analyzes doctrinal approaches to the legal status of artificial intelligence (AI) in criminal proceedings. It examines the instrumental paradigm, issues of subjecthood, evidentiary value of algorithmic conclusions, liability, and ethical standards. The position is substantiated that AI should primarily play an auxiliary role while preserving the anthropocentric nature of criminal procedure.

The article examines the formation of a unified system of “end-to-end” preventive algorithmic control in the field of financial legal relations. The author hypothesized a model of institutional unity (integration) of data exchange during a control event (a set of automated verification actions) performed within a legally regulated ecosystem. There is a shortage of legal tools for confirming the correctness (verification) of algorithms for making legally significant decisions in digital ecosystems. The necessity of legalizing the status of investment and settlement platforms (operators of digital ecosystems) is substantiated as «technological control agents». The question is raised about the need to rethink the category of “guilt” in financial law and create a new system of special digital procedural guarantees and protection of violated rights within the framework of the formation of digital financial procedural law.

В статье рассмотрены общие аспекты регулирования семейных и брачных отношений на раннем этапе становления права и государства в Древнем Риме. Проведен историко-правовой анализ эволюции семейно-брачных отношений в античной цивилизации периода Древнего Рима. Установлена обратно пропорциональная взаимосвязь в сфере соотношения государства и семейно-брачной сферы: чем более развитой и сложной становилась система римского государства, тем большей простотой и «приземленностью» характеризовались институты семьи и брака, способы и результаты их установления.