The article is devoted to the current problem of the contradiction between the substantive assessment of violations by arbitration managers in bankruptcy proceedings and the formal approach to bringing to administrative liability under Part 3.1 of Article 14.13 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. The lack of alternative to disqualification for repeated violations creates a systemic problem: courts are forced to apply the principle of insignificance to overcome the disproportionate nature of punishment, which contradicts the principle of the inevitability of liability. The article analyzes the judicial practice of arbitration districts, the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation regarding the public-law status of managers and constitutional standards of proportionality. It is proposed to introduce an alternative fine of an increased size, differentiated according to the degree of public danger of the violations, to ensure individualization of punishment.

The article examines issues related to the correlation between the legal status of an arbitration manager and the administrative liability established for him and its compliance with such status: using formal legal and comparative legal analysis methods, the article analyzes the legal norms governing the administrative liability of an arbitration manager, concludes that such liability is inconsistent with the legal status of the manager, and develops recommendations for improving the relevant part of the current legislation.

Статья посвящена анализу перспектив публично-правового подхода к регулированию правоотношений по возмещению имущественных потерь, причиненных действиями государства. Данная точка зрения рассматривается автором с позиции соответствия представленной теории критериям верификации правового исследования, соответствия юридической природе правоотношений. В результате автором делается вывод о наличии естественных предпосылок к обратному пониманию исследуемых правоотношений как исключительно частноправовых. Также автором указывается на несоответствие публично-правового подхода динамике развития взаимоотношений личности и государства в аспекте истории становления правовых институтов России.

This scientific article examines local self-government in closed administrative-territorial entities (hereinafter referred to as ZATOs) as a unique political and legal phenomenon in the public authority system of the Russian Federation. The author advances and substantiates the thesis that local self-government in ZATOs is a unique political and legal phenomenon, a system of political and legal relations, interrelations, and elements, the uniqueness of which is due, in particular, to the fact that ZATO local governments are the only organizational and legal form of municipal authority functioning in a closed territory. Using dialectical methods of scientific inquiry in studying this political and legal phenomenon, the author of this scientific article concludes that the public legal status of ZATO municipal governments is determined by the legislatively established special legal status of ZATOs as closed municipal entities, which ensure the safe functioning of organizations and facilities of national importance located within their territory. Furthermore, the author's study of the structure of this political and legal phenomenon, in particular its political and legal components, is of scholarly interest. Their integrity and dialectical unity are embodied in the daily activities of local government bodies in closed administrative-territorial entities (ZATOs), which serve as the institutional foundation of this political and legal phenomenon and, along with a set of public legal procedures and mechanisms, also comprise its structure.

В статье рассмотрено формирование правосубъектности федеральной территории «Сириус» как нового публично-правового образования. Данное образование является субъектом публичных, властных отношений и наделено компетентностными полномочиями. Вместе с тем федеральная территория не имплементирована в качестве субъекта гражданского оборота. Методами сравнительного анализа содержания правового регулирования и онтологическими представлениями о месте данного образования в системе ординарных публично-правовых образований автором констатированы выводы о допущенных ошибках в конструировании правосубъектности федеральной территории.

The article examines the issues surrounding challenges to notarized wills on the grounds of an alleged defect of the testator's will. Particular attention is paid to the evidentiary value of a notarized will. The paper substantiates the necessity of establishing, within judicial and law enforcement practice, a presumption of reliability of notarized expressions of intent. Special emphasis is placed on the public-law status of the notary as a person ensuring the recording and protection of the testator's last will and testament. It is concluded that challenges to notarized wills should be exceptional in nature and permissible only where sufficient and consistent evidence exists confirming the existence of a defect of will at the time of the notarial act.