Proceeding from the principle of procedural economy, the number of actions and procedures carried out in the course of legal proceedings (especially in civilised proceedings) is quite limited and self-sufficient for making a final ruling. Going beyond the procedural form, according to the usual practice, is not desirable, but in the course of resolving any case there are related issues, including those affecting public law and order, which are not only possible, but should be resolved both in the interests of the parties to the proceedings, and in the state and public interest. We believe that avoidance of resolution of these issues is not admissible, and related court rulings should be singled out in a separate group, which are under special control of higher judicial instances and subject to independent appeal (without limiting the number of instances and without payment of state duty).