The article examines the specifics of the emergence and resolution of electoral disputes in the conditions of the active digital transformation of electoral procedures. The authors introduce and justify the concept of a digitoral conflict as a specific type of electoral dispute related to the use of digital technologies (remote electronic voting, automated vote counting systems, identification systems, etc.). The main sources of digitoral conflicts are analyzed: technical failures, software vulnerabilities, shortcomings in legal regulation, and the low level of digital literacy among process participants. A systemic approach to digital prevention is proposed: technical measures (stress testing, open source code, redundancy), legal regulation (regulation of digital evidence, incident review procedures), educational initiatives (improvement of digital literacy, public awareness campaigns), and institutional innovations (online mediation, centralized complaint platforms, digital pilot elections). Special attention is paid to innovative tools such as smart contract arbitration, preventive audits, blockchain-based incident registries, and digital assistants for voters. Conclusions are drawn about the need for comprehensive integration of technical, legal, and social instruments to minimize digitoral conflicts and strengthen trust in digital electoral procedures.