+7 (495) 953-91-08
Sign Up Log In
Basket (0)
Русский English
Law Between East and West № 04/2024
Published Date: 12.12.2024

Evolution of the Institution of Public Order in Countries of the Romano-Germanic Legal Family

Annotation

The article considers the common features and peculiarities of interaction of legal systems in integration associations of various types. The international treaty (conventional) form of unification of law is a universal form of creation of uniform legal regulation. At the same time, for integration associations of supranational type it is typical to use the supranational form of creation of uniform legal regulation through decision-making by bodies of the integration association. The use of the form of international model regulation is widespread in integration associations of the interstate type of cooperation. Convergence of law in integration associations of a new type (BRICS) is carried out mainly on the basis of soft law. Consideration of conflicts of legal norms in relation to integration associations of various types shows their relationship with the norms of international, integration (supranational) and national law. The author notes that the study of conflicts of legal norms in the light of interaction of legal systems within the framework of integration associations can contribute to a comprehensive consideration of various types of legal collisions and ways to overcome them. The article proposes a classification of conflicts of legal norms depending on the legal norm’s belonging to a particular legal system: conflicts of norms of international and national law; conflicts of norms of international and integration law; conflicts of norms of integration and national law; conflicts of norms of different integration legal orders. The article points out the advisability of continuing the study of various forms of interaction between legal regulators in the space of an integration association in the context of the emergence of new forms of integration cooperation.

Type Article
Information Law Between East and West № 04/2024
Pages 21-31
Library
1. Meijers, E.M. L’histoire des principes fondamentaux du droit international privé a partir du moyen age / E.M. Meijers // Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Vol. 49. The Hague : Brill, 1934.
2. Zarra, G. Between the Application of Foreign Law and the Imperative Application of Domestic Law: A Historical Analysis / G. Zarra // Imperativeness in Private International Law. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2022. P. 1–53. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94</a>
3. Thin, S. Community Interest and the International Public Legal Order / S. Thin // Netherlands International Law Review. 2021. Vol. 68. Iss. 1. P. 35–59. DOI: 10.1007/s40802-021-00186-7.
4. Stevenson, J.R. The Relationship of Private International Law to Public International Law / J.R. Stevenson // Columbia Law Review. 1952. Vol. 5. Р. 561–88.
5. Rückert, J. Friedrich Carl von Savigny, the Legal Method, and the Modernity of Law / J. Rückert // Juridica International. 2006. Vol. 9. P. 55–67.
6. Peari, S. Savigny’s Theory of Choice-of-law as a Principle of “Voluntary submission” / S. Peari // The University of Toronto Law Journal. 2014. Vol. 64. Iss. 1. Р. 106–151.
7. Pach, Zs.P. The Shifting of International Trade Routes in the 15th–17th Centuries / Zs.P. Pach // Acta Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 1968. Vol. 14. Р. 287–321.
8. Orakhelashvili, A. Peremptory Norms as International Public Order // Orakhelashvili A. Peremptory Norms in International Law / A. Orakhelashvili. Oxford : Oxford Monographs in International Law, 2008. P. 7–35. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546</a>
9. Nadelmann, K.H. Bicentennial Observations on the Second Edition of Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws / K.H. Nadelmann // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1980. Vol. 28. Iss. 1. Р. 67–77. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/839735." target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/839735.</a>
10. Галушко Д.В. Эволюция института публичного порядка в странах англо-американской правовой семьи / Д.В. Галушко // Право между Востоком и Западом. 2024. № 1. С. 39–47.
11. Marglin, J.M. Nationality on Trial: International Private Law across the Mediterranean / J.M. Marglin // Annales Histoire, Sciences Sociales. 2018. Vol. 73. Iss. 1. Р. 81–113. DOI: 10.1017/ahsse.2020.12.
12. Lorenzen, Ernest G. Huber’s de conflictu legume / G. Lorenzen Ernest // Illinois Law Review. 1918–1919. Vol. 13. P. 199–242.
13. Lloyd, D. Public Policy: A Comparative Study in English and French Law / D. Lloyd. London : The Athlone Press, 1953. 166 p.
14. Hatzimihail, N.E. “Nunc veniamus ad glossam”: Bartolus on the Conflict of Laws / N.E. Hatzimihail // Preclassical Conflict of Laws : cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law. Cambridge University Press, 2021. P. 219–251.
15. Efrat, A. Promoting trade through private law: Explaining international legal harmonization / A. Efrat // Review of International Organisations. 2016. Vol. 11. P. 311–336. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9231-y." target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9231-y.</a>
16. Dolinger, J. Evolution of principles for resolving conflicts in the field of contracts and torts / J. Dolinger // Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff Pubishers, 2000. Vol. 283. P. 187–512.
17. Bodenheimer, E. The Public Policy Exception in Private International Law: A Reappraisal in the Light of Legal Philosophy / E. Bodenheimer // SEMINAR. 1954. Vol. 12. P. 51–98.
18. Международное частное право: Иностранное законодательство / предисловие А.Л. Маковского ; составители и научные редакторы: А.Н. Жильцов, А.И. Муранов. Москва : Статут, 2000. 892 с.
Other articles