Published Date: 12.11.2026

Legal Regulation of the Principles of Bioethics and Biolaw in the Republic of South Africa

Annotation

Purpose. Reconstruction of the stages of formation of legal regulation of biolaw and bioethics in the Republic of South Africa over the past forty years, characterization of the current system and determination of its development prospects. Methods: general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, systems approach); specific legal methods (historical-legal, formal-legal, comparative-legal). Results: regulation has evolved from fragmented apartheid-era legislation and discriminatory voluntary guidelines to a constitutionally grounded statutory system (section 12(2)(c) of the 1996 Constitution, National Health Act of 2003); decisions of research ethics committees are binding in the administrative-regulatory sense yet subordinate to legislation and judicial review; the current stage constitutes a reflexive restructuring with a reform agenda concerning minors' consent, heritable genome editing, end-of-life decisions and artificial intelligence.




Library

1. Andanda P. Regulation of Biobanks in South Africa / P. Andanda, S. Govender // Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2015. Vol. 43. Iss. 4. P. 787–800
2. Bronstein, V. Streamlining regulatory processes for health researchers. To what extent does the Protection of Personal Information Act apply? / V. Bronstein, D.T. Nyachowe // South African Medical Journal. 2023. Vol. 113. Iss. 8. P. 30–33. DOI: 10.7196/SA
3. Dhai, A. Consent in health research with incapacitated adults in a time of pandemic. The National Health Research Ethics Council needs to urgently reassess its guidelines / A. Dhai, C. Stein // South African Journal of Bioethics and Law. 2020. Vol. 13. Is
4. Dhai, A. The evolution of research participant protections in South Africa / A. Dhai // South African Medical Journal. 2017. Vol. 107. Iss. 7. P. 571–572. DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i7.12438.
5. Donnelly, D.-L. Children as participants in health research in South Africa. A response to Labuschaigne, Mahomed and Dhai / D.-L. Donnelly, D.W. Thaldar // Developing World Bioethics. 2024. Vol. 24. Iss. 3. P. 167–171.
6. Moodley, K. Health research ethics committees in South Africa 12 years into democracy / K. Moodley, L. Myer // BMC Medical Ethics. 2007. Vol. 8. Art. 1. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-1.
7. Naidoo, T. Overview of AI regulation in healthcare. A comparative study of the EU and South Africa / T. Naidoo // South African Journal of Bioethics and Law. 2024. Vol. 17. Iss. 3. P. 121–126.
8. Strode, A. Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines / A.E. Strode, P.P. Singh, C.M. Slack, D.R. Wassenaar // South African Medi

Other articles