Published Date: 12.11.2026
Genetic Sovereignty within the System of Functions of Public Authorities: A Doctrinal Model and Transboundary Reality
Annotation
This article demonstrates the qualitative impact of the development of genomic technologies on national security, which is leading to the emergence of new functions for government agencies. It is argued that the accumulation of human genetic data, its use for various social purposes, and the growing dependence of personalized medicine on information about human biology have led to the transition of genetics from a fundamental science to a critical factor in state sovereignty. The specific aspects of the sovereignty of human genetic data are highlighted. A comparative legal study of the concept of genetic sovereignty is conducted (using the examples of Mexico and China).
| Type | Article |
| Information | State Power and Local Self-government № 11/2026 |
| Pages | 9-14 |
| DOI | 10.18572/1813-1247-2026-11-9-14 |
Library
1. Benjamin, R. A Lab of Their Own: Genomic sovereignty as postcolonial science policy / R. Benjamin // Policy and Society. 2009. Vol. 28. Iss. 4. Р. 341–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.09.007.
2. Kabata, F. Regulating human genomic research in Africa: why a human rights approach is a more promising conceptual framework than genomic sovereignty / F. Kabata, D. Thaldar // Frontiers in Genetics. 2023. Vol. 14. Art. 1208606. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.12
3. Kaye, J. Including all voices in international data-sharing governance / J. Kaye, S.F. Terry, E. Juengst [et al.] // Human Genomics. 2018. Vol. 12. Iss. 1. Art. 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0143-9
4. Peng, Y. From ownership to custodianship: rethinking human biospecimens data governance in the Chinese context / Y. Peng, J. Li, R. Lei // Frontiers in Genetics. 2025. Vol. 16. Art. 1621739. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1621739.
5. Samuel, G.N. The UK’s 100,000 Genomes Project: manifesting policymakers’ expectations / G.N. Samuel, B. Farsides // New Genetics and Society. 2017. Vol. 36. Iss. 4. Р. 336–353. DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2017.1370671.
6. Schwartz-Marín, E. Genomic Sovereignty and the “Mexican Genome” an ethnography of postcolonial biopolitics : PhD dissertation / E. Schwartz-Marín. EGENIS-ESRC Centre for Genomics in Society, 2011. 295 p.
7. Schwartz-Marín, E. The law of genomic sovereignty and the protection of “Mexican genetic patrimony” / E. Schwartz-Marín, A.A. Méndez // Medical Law. 2012. Vol. 31. Iss. 2. Р. 283–294.
8. Vries, J. de. Genomic sovereignty and the African promise: mining the African genome for the benefit of Africa / J. de Vries, M. Pepper // Journal of Medical Ethics. 2012. Vol. 38. Iss. 8. Р. 474–478.
9. Vries, J. de. Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries / J. de Vries, S.N. Munung, A. Matimba [et al.] // BMC Medical Ethics. 2017. Vol. 18. Iss. 1.
10. Ying, D. Population-scale genomic medicine with the Hong Kong Genome Project / D. Ying, C.L. Cheung [et al.] // Nature Medicine. 2026. Vol. 32. Р. 2277–2287. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04410-w.
11. Zhang, J.Y. Commoning genomic solidarity to improve global health equality / J.Y. Zhang // Cell Genomics. 2023. Vol. 3. Iss. 10. Art. 100405. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100405.
12. Zhang, J.Y. What Do the British and Chinese Governing Visions on Human Genomic Research Tell Us about Biosovereignty? / J.Y. Zhang // Asian Biotechnology and Development Review. 2023. Vol. 25. Iss. 1–2. P. 5–23.
Get access to the article