+7 (495) 953-91-08
Sign Up Log In
Basket (0)
Русский English
State Power and Local Self-government № 11/2026
Published Date: 12.11.2026

The Precautionary Principle in UNESCO International Biolaw and Its Promotion through State Action

Annotation

This research article examines the legal nature, content, and significance of the precautionary principle in international biolaw, as well as its promotion through the activities of UNESCO and sovereign states. It identifies challenges in the legal regulation, interpretation, and application of the precautionary principle in the context of scientific and technological progress, biotechnology, and scientific advances. The author concludes that this principle should not be pitted against technical progress, scientific advances, or technological innovation. Its purpose is to promote the prevention of unnecessary risks and the search for “alternative development paths” that may be considered safer or more environmentally friendly technologies.

Type Article
Information State Power and Local Self-government № 11/2026
Pages 3-8
DOI 10.18572/1813-1247-2026-11-3-8
Library
1. Алешкова И.А. Принцип предосторожности в производстве и использовании генетически модифицированных организмов: правовое регулирование и стратегирование в России / И.А. Алешкова // Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер
2. Титова Е.В. Право на биобезопасность в контексте биоконституционализма: парадигмы государственного регулирования и особенности судебной защиты в России / Е.В. Титова // Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. 2025. № 11. С. 24–29.
3. Умнова-Конюхова И.А. Экологическая и биологическая безопасность как гарантии права на жизнь в естественной среде / И.А. Умнова-Конюхова, И.А. Алешкова // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. 2024. Т. 17. № 6. С. 58–73.
4. Ahteensuu M. The Precautionary Principle / M. Ahteensuu, P. Sandin // Handbook of Risk Theory / eds. by S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, M. Peterson. Dordrecht : Springer, 2012. P. 961–978.
5. Andorno, R. Principles of international biolaw: seeking common ground at the intersection of bioethics and human rights / R. Andorno. Brussels : Bruylant, 2013. 219 p.
6. Andorno, R. The Precautionary Principle: A New Legal Standard for a Technological Age / R. Andorno // Journal of International Biotechnology Law (JIBL). 2004. Vol. 1. Iss. 1. P. 11–19. DOI: 10.1515/jibl.2004.1.1.11.
7. Andorno, R. The role of UNESCO in promoting universal human rights: from 1948 to 2005 / R. Andorno // International biolaw and shared ethical principles: the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and Bioethics / eds. by C. Caporale, I.R. Pavone. New York,
8. Berdinesen, H. On Hans Jonas’ “The Imperative of Responsibility” / H. Berdinesen // Philosophia. e-journal for philosophy & culture. 2017. Iss. 17. P. 16–28.
9. Have H. ten. Precautionary Principle / H. ten Have, M. Patrão Neves // Dictionary of Global Bioethics. Cham : Springer, 2021. P. 839. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-030-54161-3_413.
10. Jonas, H. The Imperative of Responsibility: in Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age / H. Jonas. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1984. 255 p.
11. The Precautionary Principle. World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST) / foreword by J.E. Fenstad, K. Matsuura. Paris : UNESCO, 2005. 52 p.
Other articles