Published Date: 10.09.2026

Legal Barriers to the Use of Museum Fund Objects by Subjects of Creative Industries

Annotation

The paper analyzes the legal barriers that arise when cultural heritage objects are used commercially by creative industries in the context of digital transformation. It is established that the dual nature of museum objects (as part of the Museum Fund of the Russian Federation and as the results of intellectual activity) requires double approval from the copyright holder and the museum management, which leads to increased costs and reduces the willingness of businesses to develop production. The paper argues that finding a balance between the public function of museums and the commercial interests of creative industries requires a differentiated approach to legal regulation. The criterion for exemption from obtaining permission to use museum items by creative industry entities is proposed to be the fact of obtaining an image from publicly available sources without actual access to the museum's funds. This allows the museum to maintain control and the possibility of compensating costs in cases where.




Library

1. Богданова Н.А. Музей Юридического факультета МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова как учебно-воспитательный и культурный центр / Н.А. Богданова, Д.Д. Коновалов // Юридическое образование и наука. 2025. № 1. С. 14–17. DOI: 10.18572/1813-1190-2025-1-14-17
2. Залевский С.А. Защита субъективного права на свободное использование произведения, имеющего режим общественного достояния, признанием права / С.А. Залевский // Гражданское право. 2026. № 1. С. 26–28. DOI: 10.18572/2070-2140-2026-1-26-28
3. Мызрова К.А. Креативные индустрии: условия развития и перспективы / К.А. Мызрова, Е.В. Рожкова, О.А. Чугунова // Экономика, предпринимательство и право. 2024. Т. 14. № 8. С. 4141–4154. DOI: 10.18334/epp.14.8.121324
4. Харитонова Ю.С. Токенизация искусства и право интеллектуальной собственности / Ю.С. Харитонова // Юрист. 2021. № 9. С. 65–73. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3929-2021-9-65-73
5. Bailey M. V&A to Scrap Academic Reproduction Fees / M. Bailey // The Art Newspaper. 2006. 30 November.
6. Hamma K.J. Public Domain Art in an Age of Easier Mechanical Reproducibility / K.J. Hamma // Art Libraries Journal. 2006. Vol. 31. Iss. 3. P. 11–15. DOI: 10.1017/S0307472200014541
7. Mazzone J. Copyfraud and other abuses in intellectual property law / J. Mazzone. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 2011. 312 p.
8. Ottone E.R. Analyse de la situation internationale des industries culturelles et créatives / E.R. Ottone // Annales des Mines – Réalités industrielles. 2022. № 1. P. 13–16. DOI: 10.3917/rindu1.221.0013
9. Renouard A.-C. Traité des droits d'auteur, dans la littérature, les sciences et les beaux-arts / A.-C. Renouard. London : Nabu Press, 2014. 490 p.
10. Tanner S. Reproduction Charging Models & Rights Policy for Digital Images in American Art Museums / S. Tanner. London : King's College London, 2004. 57 p.

Other articles