Annotation

The article analyzes issues of the legal nature of changing the method and procedure for executing the requirements of a writ of execution. From the standpoint of interpreting procedural norms, the concepts of “method” and “procedure” are examined. The author analyzes the terms and their content in a comparative analysis with such concepts as “measures of compulsory enforcement” and “enforcement actions.” From the standpoint of the legal nature of the concepts under study, it is concluded that measures of compulsory enforcement and the method of execution are identical in their content, just as the procedure of execution implies specific enforcement actions aimed at the actual fulfillment of the requirement of the writ of execution. Judicial practice in examining applications for changing the method and procedure of execution is critically analyzed through the prism of the substitution of concepts, as a result of which the legal nature of changing the method and procedure for executing the requirements of writs of execution, and the change of the method and procedure of execution, is distorted.