Annotation

The article examines the problems of using electronic evidence in the arbitration process, in particular, analyzes the use of the GetContact service and its data as sources of evidence. The author, having studied the materials of judicial practice, concludes that despite the widespread practice of using the data of the GetContact service, the legal nature of such electronic evidence and the admissibility still raise many questions. The author also notes that the existing judicial practice is not clear: in some cases, data from GetContact is accepted as evidence, while in others it is rejected due to the lack of accuracy and the possibility of identifying the author of the information. This highlights the complexity and ambiguity of the courts' approaches to assessing modern electronic data sources. In conclusion, the author points out the possibility of using information from the GetContact service only as an auxiliary argument, which should be supported by more traditional types of evidence.