Published Date: 28.05.2026

A Comparative Law Analysis of Foreign Models of Local Self-Government Digitalization

Annotation

The article is dedicated to exploring international experiences in implementing digital technologies within local government systems and comparing them with domestic realities. A detailed analysis of current digitalization processes in local governance has been conducted, revealing key advantages and disadvantages of each existing model. The study aims to examine best practices from around the world that operate across different continents, as well as their potential adaptation to Russian realities. The focus is on three of the most prevalent practices: direct online democracy, electronic bricolage (“E-Bricolage”), and digital crowdsourcing. The research is based on both scientific findings from foreign authors and an empirical study of the current situation, which includes statistical analysis, monitoring of official web resources, and more. The study concludes that all models differ in the extent to which they allow citizens to directly influence decision-making by local authorities. It is concluded that there is originality in the Russian path toward the digitalization of local self-government, despite its later emergence compared to international counterparts.




Library

1. Курячая М.М. Проблемы сетевого взаимодействия граждан и органов публичной власти / М.М. Курячая // Современная политическая наука о траекториях развития государства, бизнеса и гражданского общества : сборник материалов Международной научно-практической (о
2. Курячая М.М. Технологии краудсорсинга в юридической практике / М.М. Курячая // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2012. № 6. С. 31–37.
3. Мамычев А.Ю. Сервисная модель модернизации публично-властной организации и управления: уровни, формы и перспективы развития / А.Ю. Мамычев // Философия права. 2012. № 6 (55). С. 29–33.
4. Черкасов А.И. Цифровая платформа Decide Madrid как средство прямой и партисипативной демократии / А.И. Черкасов // Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. 2025. № 6. С. 44–48. DOI 10.18572/1813-1247-2025-6-44-48.
5. Agger, A. Democratic innovations in municipal planning: Potentials and challenges of place-based platforms for deliberation between politicians and citizens / A. Agger // Cities. 2021. Vol. 1–10. Р. 117.
6. Pasalic, I.N. E-participation in Local Self-Government in CroatiaE-sudjelovanje u hrvatskoj lokalnoj samoupravi / I.N. Pasalic // Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava. 2024. Vol. 24 (3). P. 447–476.
7. Pedersen, J. Conceptual Foundations of Crowdsourcing: A Review of IS Research / J. Pedersen [et al.] // 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Wailea, HI, USA, 2013. P. 579–588. IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2013.143.
8. Tu Thi Thoa. Direct Democracy under the Conditions of One Party Ruling in Modern Vietnam / Tu Thi Thoa, Nguyen Duc Cuong // Via in tempore. History and political science. 2022. Vol. 49 (3). P. 701–710 (in Russian). DOI: 10.52575/2687-0967-2022-49-3-701-71
9. Wirtz, B.W. E-participation: A Strategic Framework / B.W. Wirtz, P. Daiser, B. Binkowska // International Journal of Public Administration. 2016. Vol. 41 (1). P. 1–12.

Other articles