Published Date: 28.05.2026

The Problem of Copyright Limits in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Annotation

This work is devoted to the study of the functioning of the existing mechanism for limiting copyright and free use of intellectual property in the context of the rapid development of artificial intelligence and the formation of a new information technology context. An analysis of current problems arising in the area under consideration through the prism of the study of normative legal regulation and legal doctrine allows us to conclude that current regulatory models need to be updated taking into account the specifics of the introduction of modern technological solutions that imitate human cognitive functions and intellectual efforts. Creating conditions that ensure the possibility of achieving and maintaining a fair balance of interests of participants in legal relations arising in connection with the creation and use of copyright objects is of particular importance in the context of implementing the task of finding a universal assessment toolkit necessary to determine the limits of copyright restriction. Based on the analysis of relevant doctrinal developments and the specifics of the current legal regulation, conclusions are formulated on the dynamic application of the three-stage test.




Library

1. Артемова А.Н. Авторское право в эпоху нейросетей / А.Н. Артемова // Интеллектуальная собственность. Авторское право и смежные права. 2024. № 3. С. 47–53.
2. Витко В. Анализ научных представлений об авторе и правах на результаты деятельности искусственного интеллекта / В. Витко // Интеллектуальная собственность. Авторское право и смежные права. 2019. № 2. C. 5–20.
3. Михайлова И.А. Трансформации законодательства об авторском праве в условиях развития искусственного интеллекта / И.А. Михайлова // Современное право. 2024. № 9. С. 90–95.
4. Серго А. Наноправо: на пороге будущего / А. Серго // Интеллектуальная собственность. Авторское право и смежные права. 2018. № 1. С. 7–14.
5. Arnold R. Are national courts the addressees of the InfoSoc three-step test? / R. Arnold, E. Rosati // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2015. Vol. 10. Iss. 10. P. 741–749.
6. Christie A.F. Comparative Analysis of the Three-Step Tests in International Treaties / A.F. Christie, R.A. Wright // International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2014. Iss. 4. P. 409–433.
7. Khor M., Raghavan C. WTO Secretariat Explains Its TRIPS Negotiating History. URL: <a href="http://pcf4.dec.uwi.edu/viewpaper.php?id=58." target="_blank">http://pcf4.dec.uwi.edu/viewpaper.php?id=58.</a>
8. Senftleben M. Copyright, Limitations and the Three-step Test: an Analysis of the Three-step Test in International and EC Copyright Law / M. Senftleben. The Hague : Kluwer Law International, 2004. 358 p.
9. The World Blind Union Guide to the Marrakesh Treaty: Facilitating Access to Books for Print-Disabled Individuals / L.R. Helfer, M.K. Land, R.L. Okediji, J.H. Reichman. New York : Oxford University Press, 2017. 240 P.
10. Xalabarder R. Fair Use in Spain: the EUCD Aftermath / R. Xalabarder // Intellectual Property & Market Power: ATRIP Papers 2006-7 / eds. by G. Ghidini, L. Genovesi. Buenos Aires : Eudeba, 2008. P. 811–819.

Other articles