Published Date: 23.04.2026

"Morphological Freedom" or the Right to Genome Modification: Dilemmas of Legal Literacy in Modern Science

Annotation

The main objectives of the article are: a) to define the concept of «morphological freedom» in the modern legal field; b) to classify the stages of this concept's development; c) to analyze the readiness of legal education to develop new competencies in future lawyers in the context of advancing genomic technologies. The article examines the gap between the pace of biomedical progress and the level of legal literacy among specialists and ways to overcome it. Methodology. The study is based on an interdisciplinary axiological approach, combining formal legal analysis and comparative law. The paper utilizes forecasting and systems analysis methods for the educational requirements for training future lawyers. Conclusions. It has been established that the traditional paradigm of legal education fails to meet the challenges of the biotechnological revolution. «Morphological freedom» in the modern world is developing in a legal vacuum, creating serious risks: discrimination based on biological characteristics, the renewal of fundamental human rights, the de facto elimination of the right to privacy, etc. The lack of specialized competence (legal literacy) among practicing lawyers will soon become a barrier to the effective protection of citizens' rights and the legal support of scientific research. Scientific and Practical Significance. The scientific value of this work lies in expanding theoretical understanding of the concept of «morphological freedom» and the legal status of modified humans. Its practical significance lies in its justification for systemic changes to the educational programs of law schools.




Library

1. Almendro V. Making the impossible possible: Baby KJ and the road map to personalized gene-editing care / V. Almendro, S.H. Kassim // Clinical and Translational Medicine. 2025. Vol. 15. Iss. 11. Art. e70515. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70515
2. Bradshaw H.G. A transhumanist fault line around disability: morphological freedom and the obligation to enhance / H.G. Bradshaw, R. ter Meulen // Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2010. Vol. 35. Iss. 6. Р. 670–684. DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhq048
3. Chernavskaya O. To the problem of digital immortality / O. Chernavskaya // Cognitive Systems Research. 2024. Vol. 88. Art. 101303.
4. Elinson, Z. Inside Silicon Valley’s Growing Obsession With Having Smarter Babies / Z. Elinson // The Wall Street Journal. 2025. 12 August.
5. Emerging Therapeutic Enhancement Enabling Health Technologies and Their Discourses: What Is Discussed within the Health Domain? / G. Wolbring, L. Diep, S Yumakulov. [et al.] // Healthcare (Basel). 2013. Vol.1. Iss. 1. Р. 20–52. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare1010
6. Glazer, E. Genetically Engineered Babies Are Banned. Tech Titans Are Trying to Make One Anyway / E. Glazer, K. Long, A.D. Marcus // The Wall Street Journal. 2025. 8 November.
7. Greely H.T. CRISPR’d babies: human germline genome editing in the «He Jiankui affair» / H.T. Greely // Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 2019. Vol. 6. Iss. 1. Р. 111–183. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz010</a>
8. Lowry, M. Heritable Genome Editing Not Yet Ready to Be Tried Safely and Effectively in Humans; Initial Clinical Uses, If Permitted, Should Be Limited to Serious Single-Gene Diseases / M. Lowry, A. Matthews-King // URL: <a href="https://www.nationalacademies.org/n" target="_blank">https://www.nationalacademies.org/n</a>
9. Mertz M. The value of bioethical research: A qualitative literature analysis of researchers' statements / M. Mertz, T. Fischer, S. Salloch // PLoS One. 2019. Vol. 14. Iss. 7. Art. e0220438. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220438
10. Mor, M. Technological self-transformation. Expanding personal extropy / M. Mor // Extropy. 193. Vol. 10. Iss. 2. P. 15–24.
11. Nam J. Biomedical enhancements as justice / J. Nam // Bioethics. 2015. Vol. 29. Iss. 2. Р. 126–132. DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12061
12. Pavarini G. Smarter Than Thou, Holier Than Thou: The Dynamic Interplay Between Cognitive and Moral Enhancement / G. Pavarini, A. McKeown, I. Singh // Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2018. Iss. 9. Art. 1189. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01189
13. Sandberg A. Morphological Freedom – Why We Not Just Want It, but Need It / A. Sandberg // The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future / eds. by M. More, N. Vita-More. John Wile
14. Tatchell J. Making Human Rights Fit for the 21st Century: The Challenge of Morphological Freedom / J. Tatchell // Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. 2015. Vol. 4. Iss. 8. Р. 34–39.

Other articles