Annotation

This article examines the problems related to the concept and substantiation of suspicion in criminal proceedings. The opinions of scientists are studied, and what should be understood by suspicion is analyzed. The conclusion is substantiated that «suspicion» is subjective in nature, since the law does not clarify this concept. The author believes what exactly is confirmation of «suspicion» affects the involvement of a person as an accused in a criminal case during the investigation. The author is convinced that the law also does not contain what should be understood by the reasona-bleness of suspicion. The suspicion will be substantiated by confirming the basis for detention and submitting personal character references with the court motion for a pre-trial measure. It is being considered which documents should be attached decision to file a motion with the court for the imposition of a preventive measure.