Annotation

Based on the analysis of legislation, normative and doctrinal sources, as well as judicial practice in considering civil disputes, the article examines the possibilities of using a review as a means of challenging an expert's opinion. At the same time, a retrospective excursion is made regarding the use of this means of proof in the modern history of judicial practice in civil proceedings, including the positions of the Supreme Judicial Authority, attention is drawn to the qualitative characteristics of the review, as well as the professional and personal qualities of reviewers. Based on the results of the study, practical recommendations are offered for judicial lawyers (advocates) representing the interests of clients in civil disputes.