Published Date: 25.12.2025

Law and Digital Sovereignty: Between East and West

Annotation

The article examines the understanding of digital sovereignty that has developed in the countries of the European Union and the People’s Republic of China. A general vision of digital sovereignty that has developed in France is presented. It is emphasized that this country was the first to have used this concept (author — P. Bellanger, in 1997). The development of the Internet on the principles of complete freedom was considered as a hidden expansion of American giants of the technology industry, as a new form of colonialism that acquired a digital shell. Such ideas influence the French law-making policy, which led to the emergence of the Law of October 7, 2016 No. 2016-1321 on the digital republic and the creation of the Institute of Digital Sovereignty. The experience of Germany, where the Center for Digital Sovereignty of Public Administration was created, is studied. It is designed to analyze the capabilities of the IT market to provide digital solutions for public administration. The German approach is based on the need to create competitive principles, which will prevent dependence on digital service providers. At the same time, the need to rely on open-source digital solutions is emphasized. The general characteristics of the «European digital sovereignty» promoted at the level of the European Union are presented, as well as the difficulties of implementing this concept. The general understanding of digital sovereignty developed in the People’s Republic of China is outlined, which is based on the implementation of national control over: data; software; hardware; digital services; network infrastructure; standards and rules of digital interaction. It is emphasized that in China this concept is considered only in relation to the state as a whole, its protective nature is emphasized, as well as the balance and moderation in regulation.




Library

1. Bellanger, P. De la souveraineté numérique / P. Bellanger // Le Débat. 2012. Vol. 170. Iss. 3. Р. 149–159.
2. Bellanger, Р. De la souveraineté en général et de la souveraineté numérique en particulier / P. Bellanger // Les Echos. 2011. 30 août.
3. Bellanger, Р. Internet: de L’Aquarium à L’Océan / P. Bellanger // Les cahiers de l'audiovisuel. 1997. Iss. 12. Р. 88–101.
4. Bellanova, R. Digital/sovereignty and European security integration: An introduction / R. Bellanova, H. Carrapico, D. Duez // European Security. 2022. Vol. 31. Iss. 3. Р. 337–355. URL: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2101887" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2101887</a>
5. Carver, J. More bark than bite? European digital sovereignty discourse and changes to the European Union’s external relations policy / J. Carver // Journal of European Public Policy. 2024. Vol. 31. Iss. 8. Р. 2250–2286. URL: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/135017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/135017</a>
6. Falkner, G. Digital sovereignty — Rhetoric and reality / G. Falkner, S. Heidebrecht, A. Obendiek, T. Seidl // Journal of European Public Policy. 2024. Vol. 31. Iss. 8. Р. 2099–2120. URL: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2358984" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2358984</a>
7. Martin, V. La République numérique en débat au Parlement : le projet de commissariat à la souveraineté numérique / V. Martin // Les Nouveaux Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel. 2017. Vol. 57. Iss. 4. Р. 107–120. URL: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3917/nccc1.057.0107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3917/nccc1.057.0107</a>
8. Mügge, D. EU AI sovereignty: for whom, to what end, and to whose benefit? / D. Mügge // Journal of European Public Policy. 2024. Vol. 31. Iss. 8. Р. 2200–2225. URL: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2318475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2318475</a>
9. Thiel, T. Forschungsdiskurse zu digitaler Souveränität / T. Thiel // Politische Vierteljahresschrift. 2024. Vol. 65. Р. 835–839.
10. Türk, P. La souveraineté numérique européenne, vers une troisième voie? / T. Thiel // Pouvoirs. 2024. Vol. 190. Iss. 3. Р. 79–90. URL: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3917/pouv.190.0079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3917/pouv.190.0079</a>
11. Was heißt digitale Souveränität? Diskurse, Praktiken und Voraussetzungen «individueller» und «staatlicher Souveränität» im digitalen Zeitalter / Hg. G. Glasze, E. Odzuck, R. Staples. Transcript, 2022. 322 s.
12. Wolff, M.C. Digitale Souveränität / M.C. Wolff. Weilerswist : Velbrück Wissenschaft, 2022. 172 s.
13. Государство как платформа: Люди и технологии / под редакцией М.С. Шклярук. Москва : РАНХиГС, 2019. 111 с.
14. 廖凡:数字主权与全球数字治理 // 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版). 2024年第7期.
15. 支振锋、刘佳琨 :互联网信息内容治理的中国方案 // 江西社会科学. 2023年第11期. URL: <a href="https://law.ucass.edu.cn/info/1985/7010.htm" target="_blank">https://law.ucass.edu.cn/info/1985/7010.htm</a>
16. 高奇琦. 数字革命中国家主权的建构. URL: <a href="https://theory.gmw.cn/2021-12/26/content_35406869.htm" target="_blank">https://theory.gmw.cn/2021-12/26/content_35406869.htm</a>

Other articles